USPTO serial 76631867
DELTERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELTERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, EC4V 4JL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin P. Hoffman
MARTIN P HOFFMAN HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER PC2461 S CLARK STSTE 522 CRYSTAL CTR 2ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3823Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Business optimization software utilizing web delivered business intelligence for optimizing the production process to maximize profitability, minimize incremented investments, and maximize sales revenues; software to improve the quality of operational and business decisions through the use of real time simulation of the business; software to allow increased visibility to business processes by web based collaboration support; software to enable the sourcing and processing of data by the use of agent technology; software to facilitate collaborative enterprise modeling and transactional environment through the use of role based web services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware, firmware and software consultancy services; computer software design for others; information technology services namely remote monitoring and maintenance of installed systems and hosting of systems; software installation; customization and development of computer systems and software; firmware and software maintenance; technical support services, namely, trouble shooting of computer hardware and software problems for software users; consultancy in the field of software design; consultancy services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; information technology consultation; technological consultation in the technology field of business optimization software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |