USPTO serial 76631978
CHURRISIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHURRISIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario M1V 4C4, CA
Scarborough, Ontario M1V 4C4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rowland Richards
ROWLAND RICHARDS PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP1 HSBC CTR STE 3400BUFFALO, NY 14203-2834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | desserts and snack foods made of deep fried dough sprinkled with sugar and/or having a filling topping or being dipped, ice cream, ice cream sundaes, banana splits with ice cream, gelato, hot chocolate, coffee, espresso, cappuccino, coffee latte, tea, tortillas and empanadas | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of coffee-houses, snack bars, carry-out restaurants and restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | coffee-house, snack bar, carry-out restaurant and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1010684 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 1010684 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHURRISIMO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |