Drawing for NANOBLACK

USPTO serial 76632239

NANOBLACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3441178Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 3, 2008
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NANOBLACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin W. Hathcock, J.D., Ph.D.

Kevin W. Hathcock, J.D., Ph.D. BALLARD SPAHR LLP999 Peachtree StreetSuite 1000Atlanta, GA 30309-3915

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemically processed nano-carbon product, manufactured from a catalyst particle, namely, metal, oxides or mixed metal oxides, and a carbon containing source, namely, gas or liquidSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 10, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 9, 2015C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 1, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 17, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 18, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 11, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 3, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 28, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 31, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 31, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 30, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 23, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 16, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 18, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 18, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Sep 27, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance