USPTO serial 76632383
NEW PROCESS GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3976227Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEW PROCESS GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aurora, Ontario L4G 7K1, CA
Aurora, Ontario L4G 7K1, CA
Aurora, Ontario L4G 7K1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Ford
David J. Ford Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC150 West JeffersonSuite 2500Detroit, MI 48226Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicle parts, namely, transmissions, transaxles, transfer cases, differentials, torque transfer couplings, shafts and driveline parts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Designing and engineering automotive parts, components and assemblies and, designing and engineering tooling for the production of automotive parts and assemblies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magna International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Magna International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Magna International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NEW PROCESS GEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 9, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |