CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CONTRACT KILLER

USPTO serial 76632561

CONTRACT KILLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CONTRACT KILLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven B. Lehat

STEVEN B LEHAT26 IRON BARK WAYIRVINE, CA 92612-2107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper articles, namely stickersACTIVEMar 14, 2004
025clothing, namely t-shirts, jerseys, pants, gloves, belts, shoes, head bands, and hatsACTIVEMar 14, 2004
028sporting articles, namely paintball gun gripsACTIVEMar 14, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Sep 26, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance