Drawing for SILICON HARNESS

USPTO serial 76633016

SILICON HARNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILICON HARNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher A. Vanderlaan

CHRISTOPHER A VANDERLAAN IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical apparatus, namely, computers and associated power and communication cabling for interconnecting them; electrical circuits, power cables and power buses, and data buses, all for power distribution, command signaling and data transfer in automated control networks including vehicle control networks; electrical cables for carrying combined data and electrical signals; electronic communication circuits for communicating with automated control network modules and facilitating control of automated networks; power switches; fiber optic cablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 1, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 8, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 25, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 25, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance