USPTO serial 76633079
BFM - BUILDING FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BFM - BUILDING FACILITIES MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Burglar alarms; anti-theft alarms; integrated circuits; computer software and programs used in the automation, control, monitoring of access, security, environment, lighting, air conditioning, and heating of buildings; closed circuit television for monitoring and security purposes; access control alarm and monitoring systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Anti-theft systems for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Be Safer - Sistemas de Controle E Informacão Ltda.
- Other trademarks owned by Be Safer - Sistemas de Controle E Informacão Ltda.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BFM - BUILDING FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |