USPTO serial 76633344
RIDP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4091175Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2012
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RIDP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
Peter D. Murray Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza 20th FloorNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY; PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS/DEVELOPERS, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL ADVICE AND INFORMATION TO VENDORS/DEVELOPERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES INCLUDING MAKING AND MAINTENANCE OF SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |