Drawing for SUNLAND

USPTO serial 76633579

SUNLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wen Liu

Wen Liu LIU & LIU444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1750Los Angeles, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019finished, semi-finished and non-finished construction materials for indoor and outdoor flooring, window, wall, fencing, signage, decking and railing, namely, floor coverings and floor treatments, namely floor tiles and floor panels made primarily of non-metal; wall coverings and wall treatments, namely wall tiles and wall panels made primarily of non-metal; fencing structures made primarily of non-metal, namely posts, boards, frames, beams, railing and guard rails; decking structures made primarily of non-metal, namely patio and balcony decking structures, namely boards, frames, posts, beams, railing and guard rails; and materials for constructing patio furniture, namely boards and frames made primarily of non-metal; signage support, namely sign posts made primarily of non-metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2006ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance