USPTO serial 76633841
LEX SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEX SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsboro, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Davis
BRIAN M DAVIS ALSTON & BIRD LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ101 S TRYON ST STE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Manufacturing of plants, recombinant protein, and other organisms and biomolecules to order and/or specification of others in the field of biotechnology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, development, and consultation services in the field of biotechnology, namely, genetic engineering of plants and other organisms, recombinant protein and other biomolecules, discovery and production in plants and other organisms and purification of recombinant proteins and other biomolecules produced in plants and other organisms; product research and development for discovering and making recombinant proteins and other recombinant biomolecules in plants and other organisms for pharmaceutical preparations and for other applications, and consultation services in the field of biotechnology for the discovery and production of pharmaceutical preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |