Drawing for PAW

USPTO serial 76633885

PAW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PAW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melville Owen

MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, TWISTED CHISELS, STRAIGHT CHISELS, SHOVELS, SPIKES, POINTS, REVERSIBLE POINTS, FORGED CHISELS, WELDED V- SWEEPS, WEEDING KNIVES, HOES, COTTON ROOT CUTTERS, FRONTS WEPT FERTILIZER INJECTION KNIVES, BACKS WEPT FERTILIZER INJECTION SHANKS, FERTILIZER INJECTION SHANKS, FURROWERS, IRRIGATION SHOVELS, FURROWING SHOVELS, FURROWER POINTS, JOYCE CULTIVATOR SWEEPS, MIXED LAND SWEEPS, FIELD CULTIVATOR SWEEPS, CHISEL/WHEAT LAND SWEEPS, DANISH "5" TINE SHANKS/SWEEPS, PEANUT SWEEPS, STRAIGHT WING UNIVERSAL SWEEPS, JOYCE SWEEP and IRRIGATION SHOVEL COMBINATION, CHISEL STANDARDS, COIL SHANKS, HARROW TEETH, SPRING HARROW SHANKS, SUBSOILER POINTS, SUBSOILER SHANKS,FLAIL MOWER KNIVES and HANGERS, ROTARY CUTTER BLADES,INCORPORATOR BLADES, ROTARY TILLER BLADES, PLOW SHARES, WELDED SHOVELS, AND CULTIVATOR STANDARDACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED
Oct 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance