USPTO serial 76633885
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melville Owen
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, TWISTED CHISELS, STRAIGHT CHISELS, SHOVELS, SPIKES, POINTS, REVERSIBLE POINTS, FORGED CHISELS, WELDED V- SWEEPS, WEEDING KNIVES, HOES, COTTON ROOT CUTTERS, FRONTS WEPT FERTILIZER INJECTION KNIVES, BACKS WEPT FERTILIZER INJECTION SHANKS, FERTILIZER INJECTION SHANKS, FURROWERS, IRRIGATION SHOVELS, FURROWING SHOVELS, FURROWER POINTS, JOYCE CULTIVATOR SWEEPS, MIXED LAND SWEEPS, FIELD CULTIVATOR SWEEPS, CHISEL/WHEAT LAND SWEEPS, DANISH "5" TINE SHANKS/SWEEPS, PEANUT SWEEPS, STRAIGHT WING UNIVERSAL SWEEPS, JOYCE SWEEP and IRRIGATION SHOVEL COMBINATION, CHISEL STANDARDS, COIL SHANKS, HARROW TEETH, SPRING HARROW SHANKS, SUBSOILER POINTS, SUBSOILER SHANKS,FLAIL MOWER KNIVES and HANGERS, ROTARY CUTTER BLADES,INCORPORATOR BLADES, ROTARY TILLER BLADES, PLOW SHARES, WELDED SHOVELS, AND CULTIVATOR STANDARD | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |