USPTO serial 76634106
A. M. T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A. M. T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Rabin
STEVEN M RABIN RABIN & PERDO PC1101 14TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SPICE Model Evaluator and Data Analyzer Software (SMEDA) for use in integrated circuit design testing in the field of semiconductors, MISmatch Analyzer Software (MISANA) for use in integrated circuit design testing in the field of semiconductors, Wafer Acceptance Test Plan Editor Software (WAT-DAP) for use in integrated circuit design testing in the field of semiconductors, and Wafer Acceptance Test Plan Editor Software (WAT-TPE) for use in integrated circuit design testing in the field of semiconductors, and software for use in integrated circuit design testing in the field of semiconductors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |