USPTO serial 76634505
MAS, MAJAPARA SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAS, MAJAPARA SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DALLAS, TX
SAN DIEGO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ELECTRONIC MONEY TRANSFER, FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS, CURRENCY EXCHANGE, ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER, CHECK CASHING SERVICES, MONEY ORDER SERVICES, ISSUING DEBIT AND CREDIT CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |