USPTO serial 76634920
CLEAN STRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CLEAN STRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL
Wrightstown, WI
COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL LLC
WRIGHTSTOWN, WI
Other trademarks owned by COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL LLC
COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL
Wrightstown, WI
COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL
Wrightstown, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Wright
Mark A. Wright McLane Middleton, Professional Association900 Elm Street, PO Box 326Manchester, NH 03105-0326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Packaging materials, namely, paperboard or cardboard wrapping and packaging materials; plastic bags for wrapping or packaging; plastic packaging and wrapping material, namely, film not for industrial and commercial packaging use; ream wrap for paper, coated and laminated paper for food wraps and coated and laminated paper for flexible packaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by COATING EXCELLENCE INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named CLEAN STRIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 14, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2014 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |