USPTO serial 76634937
MEMO-CLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEMO-CLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COSTA MESA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | OFFICE SUPPLY PRODUCT THAT IS A HYBRID BETWEEN A NOTE AND PAPERCLIP; WITH UNIQUE LASER DYE CUTS; ADHESIVE BACKING; AS WELL AS MOLDED RUBBER COMPOUND MATERIAL (POLYMERIC INJECTION MOLDING AND/OR SYNTHETICS RUBBER THAT CLIP ON THE FRONT FOR ADHERING TO TOP-LEFT-RIGHT SIDE OF LETTERS, REPORTS AND MANUALS; PRODUCT HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR SPANNING MANY INDUSTRIES AND COULD BE PROVEN TO BE NOVEL WHILE USEFUL WITH THE POTENTIAL OF BEING AN OFFICE SUPPLY THAT IS UBIQUITOUS AS THE "PAPER CLIP" ITSELF | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |