USPTO serial 76634947
HEALING DESERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALING DESERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah L. Feldman
DEBORAH L FELDMAN KULIK, GOTTESMAN, MOUTON & SIEGEL LLP15303 VENTURA BLVD STE 1400SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403-6610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and cleaning preparations, namely face and body liquid and bar soap, cosmetics, toiletries and face lotions and creams | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |