USPTO serial 76635256
DA BOMB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DA BOMB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth L. Tolar
KENNETH L TOLAR2908 HESSMER AVE STE 2METAIRIE, LA 70002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Tobacco products, namely, flavored tobacco, cigars, cigar wraps and cigarettes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DA BOMB PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunrise Tobacco, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DA BOMB PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named DA BOMB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |