USPTO serial 76635298
65MAX ENTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 65MAX ENTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | HATS, SWEATSHIRTS, JACKETS | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 2007 |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- Advertising and publicity services, namely securing air time on all forms of media communications stations, systems, networks, and services for the purpose of promoting the goods and services of others; and; Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- Advertising and publicity services, namely, promoting the goods, services, brand identity and commercial information and news of third parties through print, audio, video, digital and on-line medium; and, Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed through a global computer network; and, Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- providing hypertext links to the web sites of others; and, Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- providing a web site at which users can link to artists, songs and albums; and, Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail sites of others; and, Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- on-line ordering and cataloging of those goods and services; and, Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, promoting the musical recordings of others by means of-- distributing advertising materials through a variety of methods | ACTIVE | Nov 5, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |