USPTO serial 76635846
RUFUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUFUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
Tiffany A. Parcher Christie, Parker & Hale, LLPP.O. Box 7068Pasadena, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOUND AND FILM RECORDINGS, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, AUDIO TAPES, COMPACT DISCS, VIDEOTAPES, VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES, DIGITAL AUDIO TAPES, COMPACT VIDEODISCS, AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS, ALL FEATURING MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FISCHER, ANDRE
- Other trademarks owned by FISCHER, ANDRE
- Other trademarks owned by WATSON, BOBBY JAN
- Other trademarks owned by WATSON, BOBBY JAN
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RUFUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |