USPTO serial 76635904
SECURIDENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECURIDENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Sokol
JEFFREY S SOKOL COOK & FRANKE SC660 E MASON STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (1) Machine facilitated, value exchange systems using biometrics to facilitate the delivery of goods or services to persons eligible to receive said goods or services, said value exchange systems comprising cameras, and/or image scanners, and/or fingerprint scanners, and/or iris scanners to capture the biometric data of a person requesting the goods or services, and computer hardware and computer software to control the capture and evaluation of the biometric data to determine the eligibility of the person to receive the goods or services and to control the delivery of the goods or services requested to thereby facilitate the delivery of the goods or services to a person deemed eligible to receive the goods or services; (2) Machine facilitated, value exchange systems using biometrics to facilitate the delivery of goods or services to persons presenting a card or document that identifies them as a person eligible to receive said goods or services, said value exchange systems comprising cameras, and/or image scanners, and/or fingerprint scanners, and/or iris scanners to capture the biometric data of a person requesting the goods or services, electronic card readers and optical document readers to read data recorded on the card or document presented, and computer hardware and computer software to control the capture and evaluation of the biometric data to determine the eligibility of the person to receive the goods or services by comparison of the captured biometric data with biometric data recorded on the presented card or document or with biometric data stored in a remote database, and to control the delivery of the goods or services requested to thereby facilitate the delivery of the goods or services to a person deemed eligible to receive the goods or services; (3) Biometric enrolment systems for enrolling biometric details of persons eligible to use a machine facilitated, value exchange system that uses biometrics to enable and facilitate delivery of goods or services, said biometric enrolment systems comprising cameras, and/or image scanners, and/or fingerprint scanners, and/or iris scanners, and computer hardware and computer software used to capture and record the person's biometric data to enrol them in the machine facilitated, biometric enabled service | ACTIVE | May 19, 2004 |
| 042 | (1) Technical consulting services, in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of machine facilitated, value exchange systems that use biometrics to facilitate the delivery of goods or services, and biometric enrolment systems for enrolling biometric details of persons eligible to use machine facilitated, value exchange systems; (2)Product research and development services, in the field of machine facilitated, value exchange systems that use biometrics to facilitate the delivery of goods or services, and biometric enrolment systems for enrolling biometric details of persons eligible to use machine facilitated, value exchange systems; (3)Design services for others in the field of machine facilitated, value exchange systems that use biometrics to facilitate the delivery of goods or services, and biometric enrolment systems for enrolling biometric details of persons eligible to use machine facilitated, value exchange systems | ACTIVE | May 19, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIODENTITY SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CRYPTOMETRICS CANADA INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SECURIDENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |