Drawing for PENTHOUSE

USPTO serial 76636141

PENTHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENTHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua R. Bressler

Attn: General Counsel GENERAL MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.6800 Broken Sound Pkwy Suite 100Boca Raton, FL 33487UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Clutches, satchels, backpacks, attache cases, briefcases, luggage, garment bags for travel, toiletry bags sold or otherwise distributed empty, pocketbooks, wallets, and leather key chainsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 14, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 5, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 4, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 4, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 15, 2009PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Apr 15, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 6, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance