USPTO serial 76636208
EMPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Ley
JOHN R LEY JOHN R LEY LLC5299 DTC BLVD STE 610GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111-3327UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Devices for medical and therapeutic use, namely light emitting devices for the relief and temporary reduction of minor muscular pain, minor joint pain, stiffness, muscle spasms, and pain associated with arthritis, sprains or strains, and for temporarily increasing local blood circulation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |