USPTO serial 76636252
MAXUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Herbert
WILLIAM F HERBERT STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | COMPOSITE METAL MATRIX ALLOY MATERIALS BASED ON ALUMINIUM FOR USE IN STORAGE CONTAINERS FOR THE NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIKKEIKIN ALUMINIUM CORE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NIKKEIKIN ALUMINIUM CORE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named MAXUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |