USPTO serial 76636292
XTERRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XTERRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee Cheng
Lee Cheng Cheng Law Group, PLLC1100 17th Street, N.W.Suite 503Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Tar and pitch; Non-metallic minerals for building or construction; Ceramic building materials, bricks and refractory products, namely, fired bricks, insulating refractory bricks, clay roofing tiles, terra cotta, ceramic roofing tiles, ceramic tiles, ceramic drain pipes, clay pipes and conduits, unfired bricks, mortars, refractory shapes made of pyrophilite; Plastic building materials, namely, plastic wallboards, plastic boundary marking posts, plastic tiles, plastic floorboards, plastic rain gutters; Asphalt, and asphalt building or construction materials, namely, asphalt, asphalt felt, asphalt roofing felt, asphalt roofing paper; Plaster; Lime building or construction materials, namely, silica calcium boards; Building or construction materials of plaster, namely, boards of plaster; Rockfall prevention nets of textile; Prefabricated building kits, not of metal, namely, shed kits and barn kits consisting of fiber cement, bricks and concrete blocks; Vegetation seed-carrier sheets for prevention of earth collapse or landslide, Plastic security windows allowing communication, Cement and its products, namely, alumina cement, Portland blast-furnace slag cement, concrete pipes, concrete piles, concrete road pavement boards, concrete poles, namely, concrete poles for electric power lines, concrete utility poles, concrete blocks, silica cement, asbestos roofing tiles, asbestos cement boards, asbestos cement pipes, asbestos cement slates, asbestos cement chimneys, slag-lime cement, cement mortar roofing tiles, cement mortar pipes, cement mortar slates, hume pipes, namely, drain pipes made of concrete and non-metal water pipes, Portland cement, magnesic cement, wood-fiber reinforced cement boards; Building timber; Building stone; Building glass; Non-metal artificial fish reefs; Prefabricated hen-houses and poultry cages, not of metal; Paint spraying booths, not of metal; Moulds for forming cement products, not of metal; Non-luminous and non-mechanical road signs, not of metal; Liquid storage tanks of masonry for building purposes; Water tanks of masonry for industrial purposes; Water tanks of masonry for household purposes; Mooring bits and bollards, not of metal; Letter boxes of masonry; Joinery fittings, not of metal; Transportable greenhouses for household purposes, not of metal; Gravestones and tomb plaques, not of metal; Diving platforms, not of metal; Stone sculptures; Concrete sculptures; Marble sculptures; Boards and powder of inorganic fiber, not of asbestos, namely, boards and powders of rock wool, boards and powder of glass fiber; and Plaster boards; and Slag stone | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kubota Matsushitadenko Exterior Works, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Kubota Matsushitadenko Exterior Works, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named XTERRA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |