USPTO serial 76636483
P3E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P3E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto 604-8511, JP
Kyoto 604-8511, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tomoko Nakajima
Tomoko Nakajima Cermak Kenealy & Vaidya LLP515 East Braddock Rd., Suite BAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical, namely, reagent for electrophoresis for non-medical purposes, polymer composition for electrophoresis | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrophoresis apparatus not for medical purposes; glass, plastic and semiconductor chips, cathode reservoir, anode reservoir, capillary tubes, plates or glass slides, all for chemical analysis or synthesis, biological analysis or patterning for scientific or laboratory research use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |