USPTO serial 76636902
NASPIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NASPIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Gamson
ARMSTRONG KRATZ QUINTOS HANSON & BROOKS LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICES502 WASHINGTON AVE STE 220TOWSON, MD 21204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Street lamps, safety lamps for underground use, germicidal lamps for purifying air, neon lamps, lanterns, dynamo lamps, discharge lamps and their fittings, incandescent light bulbs, incandescent lamps and their fittings, ultraviolet ray lamps (not for medical purposes), germicidal lamps, chandeliers, water surface lamps, mercury lamps, aquarium lights, spotlights, arc lamps, safety lamps, diving lights, fairy lights for festive decoration, infrared lamps, electric night lights, fish gathering lamps, ceiling lights, electric holiday lights, electric lights for Christmas trees, desk lamps, searchlights, artificial solar lamps, floodlights, fluorescent electric light bulbs, flashlights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |