Drawing for CHEF'S GOLD

USPTO serial 76637395

CHEF'S GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHEF'S GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

EDWARD D LANQUIST JR WADDEY & PATTERSON PC1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Kitchen electrics, namely, food blenders, dish washing machines, food slicers, vacuum cleaners, beverage mixers as kitchen machines, power-operated coffee grinders, electric food choppers, electric meat grinders, electric knife sharpeners, and multi-purpose high pressure washersACTIVE—
008Cutlery, namely, forks, spoons, and knives, knife sharpeners and flatwareACTIVE—
009Heat sealing machines for food and clothing and steam ironsACTIVE—
011Small appliances, namely, barbecue grills, convection ovens, gas and electric cookers, electrical ice cream makers, induction table top ranges, electric frying pans, electric grills, electric steam grills, electric hot plates, electric knives, microwave ovens, electric pressure cookers, electric roasters, electric slow cookers, electric toaster ovens, and electric toastersACTIVE—
016Paper placemats and paper napkinsACTIVE—
020Chairs, stools, carts, step stools, ladders, tables, outdoor furnitureACTIVE—
021Cookware, namely, pot racks, pots, pans, non-electric camping grills, non-electric frying pans, bowls, saute pans, multi-use pots, clam pots, Windsor pans, lasagna pans, paella pans, tea kettles, griddles, stockpots, saucepans, non-electric chicken fryers, non-electric pressure cookers, cutting boards, mops, seasonal salt shakers, bakeware, plates, drinking glasses, servingware for serving food, serving spoons, mixing spoons, basting spoons, and rechargeable, battery-operated wine cork remover, and hand-operated coffee grinders, kitchen tools and gadgetsACTIVE—
024Plastic, textile and vinyl placemats and textile napkinsACTIVE—
030Coffee beans, coffee beans decaffeinated, coffee pods, coffee pods decaffeinated, chocolate, ground coffee, ground coffee decaffeinatedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 11, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance