USPTO serial 76637594
THE BLUE-CHIP REMOTE GAMING SOFTWARE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BLUE-CHIP REMOTE GAMING SOFTWARE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon S. Lazarovitz
SHELDON S LAZAROVITZ31 WESTGATE BLVDTORONTO, ON M3H 1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | software development in the field of gaming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |