Drawing for AVE

USPTO serial 76638290

AVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Walter E. Hanley, Esq.

WALTER E HANLEY ESQ KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007mechanical engine parts for land, sea and air vehicles; electric generators; internal combustion engines not for land vehicles; liquid and/or gas pumps for use in engines, namely, liquid pumps for oil, fuel, water, refrigerants and other liquid chemical compositions and gas pumps for air, natural gas, refrigerants and other gaseous chemical compositionsACTIVE—
012internal combustion engines for land vehicles; replacement parts and accessories thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 21, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 21, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 21, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 26, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance