USPTO serial 76638796
Serial No. 76638796
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76638796?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DON B. FINKELSTEIN
DON B FINKELSTEIN LAW OFFICES OF DON FINKELSTEIN3858 W CARSON ST STE 216TORRANCE, CA 90503-6700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING JEWELRY, CLOTHING, HANDBAGS, SURFING, SKATE BOARDING, BOOGIE BOARDING AND SNOW BOARDING EQUIPMENT, WATER SPORTS EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, SUN GLASSES | ACTIVE | May 8, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PGDV | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |