USPTO serial 76638924
SIT N RUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIT N RUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2408 Nicosia, CY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon S. Lazarovitz
SHELDON S LAZAROVITZ31 WESTGATE BLVDTORONTO, ON M3H 1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, arranging, organizing and providing gaming events and gaming competitions; providing a website for the playing of card games and casino type games and for competitions for those games via the global computer network, wireless networks, or interactive television and providing information related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |