USPTO serial 76639551
GAES INSTITUTO AUDITIVO ESPANOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAES INSTITUTO AUDITIVO ESPANOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Eisenhart
JOHN C EISENHART FLESHNER & KIM LLPPO BOX 221200CHANTILLY, VA 20153-1200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | speech and hearing therapy; and hearing aid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |