USPTO serial 76639678
SMARTBLANKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3231724Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTBLANKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cort Flint
CORT FLINT MCNAIR LAW FIRM PAPOST OFFICE BOX 10827GREENVILLE, SC 29603-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Textile security blanket with a fiber-optic sensor line incorporated therein, for prohibiting removal of goods from beneath the blanket | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Woven Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Woven Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by WOVEN ELECTRONICS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTBLANKET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |