USPTO serial 76639806
FIBRO-VEIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIBRO-VEIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Vande Sande
THOMAS J VANDE SANDE HALL VANDE SANDE & PEQUIGNOT LLP10220 RIVER RD STE 200POTOMAC, MD 20854-4932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | injectable pharmaceutical for the treatment of varicose veins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |