Drawing for GRIDNET BROADBAND

USPTO serial 76640018

GRIDNET BROADBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIDNET BROADBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher S. Beer

CHRISTOPHER S BEER IRONMARK LAW GROUP PLLC2311 N 45TH ST STE 365SEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols, Telecommunications and data networking software, namely, software for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocolsACTIVE
038Providing access to telecommunications data networks for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; Telecommunications consultation for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols, Transfer of data by telecommunications, namely, transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communications via telecommunication networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance