Drawing for AVERAGE

USPTO serial 76640066

AVERAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVERAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP, IP SECTION1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, shirts, bras, blouses, jackets, swim suits, lounge wear, pajamas and T-shirtACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 11, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED
Aug 24, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Aug 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance