USPTO serial 76640320
SILVERCLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILVERCLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Province of Quebec, CA
Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWEL, III
A. YATES DOWELL, III Dowell & Dowell, P.C.103 Oronoco St.Suite 220Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | ANTIMICROBIAL TREATED TEXTILE FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING, UNDERWEAR, SOCKS, HYGIENE PRODUCTS, UPHOLSTERY FABRIC, BED SHEETS, FITTED BED SHEET COVERS, CURTAIN FABRICS, CARPETS, SURGICAL BANDAGES, DRESSINGS AND MASKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |