Drawing for KUROTEL CENTRO DE LONGEVIDADE E SPA

USPTO serial 76640844

KUROTEL CENTRO DE LONGEVIDADE E SPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KUROTEL CENTRO DE LONGEVIDADE E SPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Shannon

John P. Shannon MEREK, BLACKMON & VOORHEES, LLC673 S. Washington St.Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotel services; restaurant services; and temporary housing for touristsACTIVE
044Medical clinics; medical services; health and beauty care services; physical therapy and convalescence clinic services; health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort; cosmetic body care services; and dietary and nutritional guidanceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 11, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 9, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance