Drawing for ROBERT ROBERTS

USPTO serial 76640855

ROBERT ROBERTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBERT ROBERTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Neuberger Weller

Susan Neuberger Weller Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo, P.C.Suite 900701 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Booklets and brochures featuring historical biographies; calendars; letter openers; lithographic prints; pencils; pencil cases; prints in the nature of photographs; writing instruments; writing tablets; albums for photographs; art prints; art pictures; book marks; postcards and postersACTIVE
041Arranging exhibitions; conducting entertainment and educational exhibitions in the nature of a history program; publication of books and brochuresACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 9, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 25, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 28, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 29, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 29, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jun 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance