Drawing for AMERICA'S ONE SOURCE

USPTO serial 76641763

AMERICA'S ONE SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICA'S ONE SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. Phillips

RICHARD S PHILLIPS WOOD, PHILLIPS, KATZ, CLARK & MORTIMERCITIGROUP CTRSTE 3800, 500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661-2511

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal site furnishings, namely, bicycle storage racksACTIVE—
019Concrete pavers and terrazzo tiles; concrete bollards; non-luminous, non-mechanical signs not of metalACTIVE—
020Metal and concrete site furnishings, namely, benches, chairs, and tablesACTIVE—
021Concrete site furnishings namely, planters and trash containersACTIVE—
028Concrete playground equipment, namely, climbing figures and basketball standardsACTIVE—
034Metal and concrete receptacles for used smoking materialsACTIVE—
040Manufacturing services for others in the field of cast concrete site furnishingsACTIVE—
042Design services for others in the field of cast concrete site furnishingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance