USPTO serial 76641829
BOMBSHELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOMBSHELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazine devoted to women's plus-size issues, namely educational, entertainment and popular culture information | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing information via an on-line magazine on the Internet devoted to women's plus-size issues, namely educational, entertainment and popular culture information; entertainment services, namely, fashion exhibitions, fashion shows; conducting classes, conferences and seminars with regard to plus-size issues; conducting model searches for plus-size models | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2009 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |