Drawing for MY DADDY OWNS A YACHT TAN

USPTO serial 76642699

MY DADDY OWNS A YACHT TAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY DADDY OWNS A YACHT TAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glen M. Burdick

GLEN M BURDICK DUNLAP, CODDING & ROGERS PCPO BOX 16370OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73113-2370UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, instant self tanning creams, exfoliate gels, moisturizing lotions, skin scrubs, tanning gels, tanning foams, tanning oils, sun screens, lip balms, bronzing powders and fade creamsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 7, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance