USPTO serial 76643942
SERVICE CONGRUENCE CUSTOMER SERVICE MODEL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT VALUES AND ATTITUDES COMMITMENT TO ACTIVITIES PURPOSE OF ORGANIZATION CONGRUENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERVICE CONGRUENCE CUSTOMER SERVICE MODEL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT VALUES AND ATTITUDES COMMITMENT TO ACTIVITIES PURPOSE OF ORGANIZATION CONGRUENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack A. Kanz
JACK A KANZ502 S COTTONWOOD DRRICHARDSON, TX 75080-5710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting seminars and training courses in leadership principles and techniques, sales and marketing techniques, personnel management, communication and self-improvement | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrity Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SERVICE CONGRUENCE CUSTOMER SERVICE MODEL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT VALUES AND ATTITUDES COMMITMENT TO ACTIVITIES PURPOSE OF ORGANIZATION CONGRUENCE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |