Drawing for GO VIDEO PDS PROFESSIONAL DUPLICATION SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76643981

GO VIDEO PDS PROFESSIONAL DUPLICATION SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GO VIDEO PDS PROFESSIONAL DUPLICATION SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven E. Kahm

STEVEN E KAHM NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU PA820 INTERNATIONAL CTR900 2ND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Copying digital data, storage of digital data on disksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 24, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 21, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance