USPTO serial 76644354
GLUTEN FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLUTEN FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Vegetable protein, soy protein, soup mixes, soup flavoring mixes, dried egg products, milk powders, milk protein, whey, processed seeds, shelled seeds, potato flakes and coated fruits | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2000 |
| 030 | Flour, bran, herbs, spices, grits, bulgur, kasha, rice, tapioca, carob powder, wheat germ, gluten, seed meal, granola cereals, muffin mixes, baking mixes, grain, biscuit mix, cookie mixes, pancake and waffle mixes, bread mixes, cereals, cornmeal, polenta, couscous, oats, sugar, starch, baking powder, baking soda, salt, cooking salt, popcorn, yeast, rolled oats, rolled grains, xantham gum, guar gum and food additives | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2000 |
| 031 | Raw seeds, spices, unpopped popcorn, unprocessed grains, millet, oats and wheat | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |