USPTO serial 76645401
DUKE SANDWICH COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4531162Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2014
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUKE SANDWICH COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACOB S WHARTON
JACOB S WHARTON WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON LLPONE WEST FOURTH STWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Duke Sandwich Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Duke Sandwich Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Duke Sandwich Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named DUKE SANDWICH COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2021 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 20, 2019 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |