USPTO serial 76645863
SMARTPSM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUKEN, BONNIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTPSM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. S. VAN LANDINGHAM, III
DYADEM INTERNATIONAL LTDSTE 401, 9050 YONGE STRICHMOND HILL, ON L4C 9S6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, which automates and manages many Process Safety Management or PSM elements including,but not limited to, management of change or MOC, incident investigation, corrective action, action tracking, mechanical integrity,process hazards analysis or PHA, occupational illness and injury,auditing, product development and project management, which allows a company or manager to establish timelines and follow the appropriate workflow for each Process Safety Management or PSM element, which allows responsibilities to be assigned or monitored and multiple projects or actions to be tracked at the facility or organizational level, which provides real-time information about the status of each Process Safety Management or PSM element, and which provides an auditable trail of a company's PSM activities to help ensure compliance with governmental safety and environmental regulations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |