USPTO serial 76646539
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Fe Springs, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | APPAREL FOR MEN, WOMEN, BOYS, GIRLS, INFANTS, AND TODDLERS, AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SLEEPWEAR, UNDERWEAR, KNIT AND WOVEN TOPS, BOTTOMS, JACKETS, SWIMWEAR, FOOTWEAR, BELTS, SOCKS, HEADWEAR, INTIMATE APPAREL, DAYWEAR, LOUNGE WEAR, BOXERS, DIE CAST TOYS, POSTERS, MOUSE PADS, CELL PHONE COVERS, BAGS, WALLETS, SCARVES, JEWELRY, KEY CHAINS, SHOT GLASSES, STICKERS, TATTOOS, TOY MINI MOTORCYCLES, TOY MINI HELMETS, TOY HELMETS, CALENDARS, TOWELS, CLOCKS, WATCHES, AIR FRESHENERS, CD CASES, LIGHTERS, NOVELTY BUTTONS, PATCHES, METAL SIGNS, WINDOW CLINGS, BOTTLE OPENERS, 3-D LENTICULAR POSTERS, SCHOOL SUPPLIES, BAGS-SLING, HAND BAGS, DUFFELS, BELT BAGS, BOOK BAGS, WALLETS, BACK PACKS, LUGGAGE, PLUSH BAGS, COIN PURSES, LUNCH BAGS, COOLERS FOR LUNCH BAGS, SHARPENERS, PENCILS, ERASERS, DATE BOOKS, MEMO PADS, FOLDERS, NOTEBOOKS, GLUE STICKS, CRAYONS, MARKERS, VALUE KITS, PENS, SCISSORS, AND RULERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |