USPTO serial 76647588
THE PAW GUARD "PROTECTION FOR YOUR AUTOMOBILE"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE PAW GUARD "PROTECTION FOR YOUR AUTOMOBILE"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Paw Guard is a foam protection devise for your automobile that stops the wear and tear on your cars interior and exterior that are made by your pets nails | ACTIVE | May 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |