USPTO serial 76647725
X BIONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4741184Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2015
- Examiner
- KENEALY,NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with X BIONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus P. Dolce
Marcus P. Dolce Flynn Thiel, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for [ babies and ] children, namely, [ bandanas, ] shirts, pants [, overalls, jeans ] ; clothing, namely, slips, socks, undergarments, sports jerseys, tights, underclothing, underwear, stockings, coats; clothing for gymnastics, namely, body suits, body stockings, [ leotards, ] shorts, tops, sweatshirts, sweat pants, unitards, leggings, gym suits [ ; outdoor clothing and sportswear in the nature of footwear, namely, shoes and sandals ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 26, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |